Over the years, we have come to know
different kinds of addictive drugs and their disastrous effects on the human
health. But there is one drug which is silently taking the entire world under
its spell. This drug is so wide spread and so addictive that everyone in almost
every part of the world has it in their house. Almost every child and adult in
the world is under the influence of this drug every day, every hour, every second,
to the point where it actually controls their mind. This is the younger
generation’s drug, this drug is ‘Television’. In the book, “The last hours of ancient
sunlight”, written by Thom Hartmann; the author talks about that global warming
and climate change issues that we face today. One of the many issues that he
points out that is affecting our thoughts about global warming is the influence
of television on our everyday thoughts and decisions. More importantly, he also
shows his concern about how the information presented on television is
controlled by a few. He states, “People set aside large portions of their lives
to watch a flickering box- hours every day. They rely on the box for the majority
of their information…even though the contents of the box are controlled by a
handful of corporations…” (130). The author explains how everyone depends so much
on ‘The box’ for information about their world, despite the fact that the
information or knowledge is in the hands of very few people. According to the
article, “These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America” written by
Ashley Lutz;
in 1983, 90 % of the media in the U.S was owned or controlled by
50 companies whereas by 2011, 90 % of the media was controlled by 6 corporations,
namely, CBS, Time Warner, Disney, Viacom, News Corp. and GE. In other words,
the information acquired by 277 million Americans every day is being provided
by only 232 media executives. This number is alarming. This is a critical
problem because that means that what people are led to believe about the entire
world is a point of view of a few, even though if it is not accurate. The dangers
of this is also discussed in the article, “Merger Mania in the Media: Can We Still Get All the
News We Need?” by John H. McManus,
where he mentions that “Diverse media
ownership can create the robust and unconstrained debate that allows the best
ideas to prevail. Consolidation, in contrast, constricts the number of
information providers and can cut down on the debate that is essential to a
democracy.” He is stating the fact that when the media is more diverse the more
information the public can acquire, leaving room for democratic debates but if
the information from almost every outlet is provided by one source, the public
will only get one perspective hence unbalancing the scale of free thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment